Pangkor War

• 1. War is usually held to assess the level of kesiagaan assets combat or logistics, especially in war situations. As a country that is prosperous, should be equipped with defensive systems that can fend off various types of attacks, whether near or far distance. Thus, congratulations to the Markas Armada in the success of Pangkor War held at the beginning of June 10 last. Apart from the mental equip members with the war situation, this exercise is to assess kesiagaan assets in preparation for any situation optimally.

• 2. However, electronic or print media coverage to participate in this exercise is not suitable for this thing more visits to the propaganda war. There is no doubt that the propaganda is one of the military medium, but comments detail about the training is not suitable. Should be, this exercise is not only assessed the weaknesses of individual skills but should be viewed from all aspects for example, the “action dress”, viewed less suitable in terms of size clothing with the body member. Average have a larger size clothing. In addition, medium fabric also looks a bit thinner than the clothes supplied previously.

• 3. In conclusion, continuous training in order to determine the level of kesiagaan personnel and assets is very important, especially in the face with war crimes in modern times. Provision should be made to better achieve this. Country's dependence on the purchase of military assets is likely to be reduced by setting up their own companies or GLCs in designing and producing products of war from their own country than to optimize the country's intellectuals. The focus of the war should be preferred to focus on the ISO or 5S being adapted by the Navy now. Is not the Navy has its own audit organization? Why should outsiders evaluate our work? Had there leakages in the audit organization, and must choose the best among the best.